Reading Tragedy and Hope by C. Quigley it becomes blindingly obvious that American financial interests successfully manipulated every aspect of Britain's entry into WW II and conspired to ruin Britain in doing so. The simple fact is that it would have been infinitely better for Britain to do as suggested by the Cliveden set and stay out of the war - preserving Britain's empire outside Europe and allowing Europe to be consumed by the German industrial machine. After all Europe has now being completely consumed by the German industrial machine through the mechanism of the EU - WW II is proven to have been a colossal waste of precious lives fighting for a bogus cause - as the weak and corrupt nations of the rest of Europe have ended up under the jackboot of German mercantilist fascism anyway.
It seems Lord Halifax was right to suggest cutting a deal with Hitler in 1940 - but it is curious that he allowed a mountebank like Churchill to press his claim and become Prime Minister at a critical point. We can only surmise that he was probably blackmailed, threatened or bought by American finance.
Britain in 1939 was not ready for war financially or in any other way. Britain owed nothing to the ungrateful and corrupt nations of Europe - and for example received nothing but ingratitude for its valiant though forlorn defence of Belgium - a nasty non-entity of a country that should never have existed and should be parcelled out between the Netherlands and France. Appeasement was by far the best policy in the late 1930's. Yet for reasons that shall become clear American financial interests had to push Britain into war as early as possible and tie its hands when prosecuting that war.
Accordingly the claims and the propaganda of Churchill were advanced relentlessly - the narrative of Churchill as a doughty defender of freedom and the pathetic and slavish propaganda presenting him ever since as the saviour of the nation - all this was done ex post hoc - after the war his reputation was embellished by endless and constant American propaganda. What is always glossed over is that his mother was an American whore - the King's mistress in the late 19th century - probably a paid spy of American financial interests. And she used her role as royal courtesan to advance the cause of her son.
Perceiving a willing careerist with no morals we can surmise that American financial interests backed a corrupt Churchill throughout his career, no doubt also supplying him with useful information from espionage that he used against the government in the late 1930's and perhaps also writing the famous speeches, many of which appear to be nothing more than relentless propaganda about the wonders of America.
Churchill was engineered into power - and from there he rapidly plunged Britain into war - exactly as was required of him. Predictably the British war effort from 1939 to 1941 was a disaster, particularly as American legislation (the Neutrality Act p. 708-09) first prevented belligerent nations from acquiring materiel in the US market, thereby greatly assisting well prepared aggressors such as Nazi Germany and disarming defenders, and subsequently only allowed cash and carry purchases and forbade loans. No doubt the same financial interests sponsored this 'isolationist' legislation and paid bribes to the 'isolationist' politicians sponsoring such legislation. Naturally the American public can be managed very easily - moved around the playing field like ignorant sheep.
Having thus strengthened Nazi Germany and weakened Britain by using statute to make it difficult for her to acquire the means to defend herself the situation in June 1941 is described on p. 707 as follows: "Britain had used up, by June 1941, almost two thirds of its dollar assets, gold stocks and marketable U S securities" purchasing materiel to pursue the war. No doubt this was exactly what US financial interests wanted. And no doubt most of Britain's wealth effectively ended up in their hands as they manipulated prices downwards enabling them to steal Britain's foreign asset holdings for bargain prices - doubtless all the while pretending to be sympathetic, and complaining about the 'isolationist' policy.
And then just as Britain was severely weakened, seemingly miraculously, the tide of US public opinion begins to turn and the case for intervention starts to be made in the corrupt US media and by the bought and paid for US President. After all it would not do for the Nazis to win so easily - the war would be over too quickly and US financial interests would be prevented from sucking the last bit of blood from both Britain and Europe - from reducing it to absolute ruin so it could then be 'rebuilt' (in the American image and with plaudits for American magnanimity). The war had to continue and a many millions of additional lives had to be lost. So Britain was then 'saved' - through Lend Lease (debt slavery) - a curious echo of present day US financial policy in which their entire population is enslaved by consumer debt to buy things they cannot make and cannot afford but which keep the factories running and the bankers receiving interest.
And so it is that Britain was comprehensively ruined and the British empire dismantled by the deceitful jackals in the American banks. This is not to mourn the empire as such, which had become a racket by 1940, but rather to observe the modus operandi of the crooks who run the American banks - their callous disregard for human life - and the brutal way in which fractional reserve banking, like a parasite devouring its host, seeks out targets and then seeks their destruction through debt slavery so that it can feast on them and consume every last drop of value. The endless expansion of debt brings forth inexorable inflation, militarism and war, as we see today. Hence the wisdom of outlawing moneyprinting, government issued currency, too-big to fail banks, limited liability and fractional reserve banking, and returning to free gold.
